<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Use Tax Assessments to Value a Home!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:42:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sellers Should Pay All Closing Costs &#124; FranklyRealty.com Trust Me I'm A REALTOR</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-4404</link>
		<dc:creator>Sellers Should Pay All Closing Costs &#124; FranklyRealty.com Trust Me I'm A REALTOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-4404</guid>
		<description>[...] Taxes will go up. Yes, perhaps. Maybe $50 a year, big deal.  Buyer tip: See post on NOT using Tax Assessments to value a home) Seller tip: Since some buyers DO use this, the HIGHER the tax assessment the better, so think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taxes will go up. Yes, perhaps. Maybe $50 a year, big deal.  Buyer tip: See post on NOT using Tax Assessments to value a home) Seller tip: Since some buyers DO use this, the HIGHER the tax assessment the better, so think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebecca</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3091</link>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3091</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a buyer but I wanted to say I just found your blog today in a link from this article http://redtape.msnbc.com/2008/07/traditionally-b.html#posts  which came up on my igoogle page. &lt;br/&gt;I work for a real estate company in South Carolina and I&#039;m adding your blog to my favorites. This is good stuff- especially your rant on the sucky agents who don&#039;t take pictures. Thanks for the fun, informative blog. I look forward to reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a buyer but I wanted to say I just found your blog today in a link from this article <a href="http://redtape.msnbc.com/2008/07/traditionally-b.html#posts" rel="nofollow">http://redtape.msnbc.com/2008/07/traditionally-b.html#posts</a>  which came up on my igoogle page. <br />I work for a real estate company in South Carolina and I&#8217;m adding your blog to my favorites. This is good stuff- especially your rant on the sucky agents who don&#8217;t take pictures. Thanks for the fun, informative blog. I look forward to reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tchaka owen</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>tchaka owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>Anon, while I generally agree with your last post, I will add that assessments often do not include any major upgrades inside a home.  Two near identical homes side by side, assessed similarly could be $50k apart in true value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, while I generally agree with your last post, I will add that assessments often do not include any major upgrades inside a home.  Two near identical homes side by side, assessed similarly could be $50k apart in true value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRANK LL0SA Va Broker- BLOG.FranklyRealty.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>FRANK LL0SA Va Broker- BLOG.FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>I feel dumb. Thanks for telling me about the typo corrections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel dumb. Thanks for telling me about the typo corrections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3088</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3088</guid>
		<description>You have a couple of homophone problems here.  The &quot;hear&quot; in your first sentence should be &quot;here,&quot; and the &quot;peak&quot; you took in the last sentence should be &quot;peek.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a couple of homophone problems here.  The &#8220;hear&#8221; in your first sentence should be &#8220;here,&#8221; and the &#8220;peak&#8221; you took in the last sentence should be &#8220;peek.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3082</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3082</guid>
		<description>Tax assessed values have historically provided a reasonably good approximation of a home value.  Here is what Arlington&#039;s website has to say about methodology:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Real estate assessments are appraisals -- the County &#039; s opinions of value for each parcel of real property in Arlington .  Assessments are made according to accepted methods, techniques, and standards of the real estate appraisal and assessment profession.   &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The 2008 assessment is an estimate of the fair market value as of January 1, 2008.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Residential assessments were based primarily on neighborhood sales occurring from July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007, and further refined using sales occurring in the summer and fall of 2007.  The real estate tax rate determines the amount of the tax which is levied on the property.  A uniform tax rate for all real property is set by the Arlington County Board.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In layman&#039;s terms - real estate professionals bless the valuations that are based on previous year sales of comparable properties.  Now you can argue what is comparable or you could simply take a sample of properties from the same neighborhood, compute the tax assed value per square foot (at the time of sale), subtract a theoretical commission for the broker (say 7% - 3.5% to the buyer’s broker and 3.5% to the seller’s broker) and you will find forecasted valuation range.  Now since tax assessments are based on trailing sales statistics of comparable properties, in falling markets like ours, keep in mind the tax assessed value will be higher then a forecasted valuation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In newer buildings like 1021 we don&#039;t have the luxury or historical info but Lion&#039;s Park and Lion&#039;s Village have been around since the 1930s so we have lots of historical data to analyze.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do agree that tax assessments are not perfect but they will tell a potential buyer if the seller has based their price on reality or 2005-2006 fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax assessed values have historically provided a reasonably good approximation of a home value.  Here is what Arlington&#8217;s website has to say about methodology:</p>
<p>Real estate assessments are appraisals &#8212; the County &#8216; s opinions of value for each parcel of real property in Arlington .  Assessments are made according to accepted methods, techniques, and standards of the real estate appraisal and assessment profession.   </p>
<p>The 2008 assessment is an estimate of the fair market value as of January 1, 2008.</p>
<p>Residential assessments were based primarily on neighborhood sales occurring from July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007, and further refined using sales occurring in the summer and fall of 2007.  The real estate tax rate determines the amount of the tax which is levied on the property.  A uniform tax rate for all real property is set by the Arlington County Board.</p>
<p>In layman&#8217;s terms &#8211; real estate professionals bless the valuations that are based on previous year sales of comparable properties.  Now you can argue what is comparable or you could simply take a sample of properties from the same neighborhood, compute the tax assed value per square foot (at the time of sale), subtract a theoretical commission for the broker (say 7% &#8211; 3.5% to the buyer’s broker and 3.5% to the seller’s broker) and you will find forecasted valuation range.  Now since tax assessments are based on trailing sales statistics of comparable properties, in falling markets like ours, keep in mind the tax assessed value will be higher then a forecasted valuation.</p>
<p>In newer buildings like 1021 we don&#8217;t have the luxury or historical info but Lion&#8217;s Park and Lion&#8217;s Village have been around since the 1930s so we have lots of historical data to analyze.  </p>
<p>I do agree that tax assessments are not perfect but they will tell a potential buyer if the seller has based their price on reality or 2005-2006 fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRANK LL0SA Va Broker- BLOG.FranklyRealty.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>FRANK LL0SA Va Broker- BLOG.FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>Great question. Sorry for skipping over the definition. &lt;br/&gt;A seller subsidy is when the seller pays for closing costs. Usually these are around 2%.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As for Realtors having access to the Seller Subsidy, yes they do. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But first of all, the buyer is the one that is frequently doing research (since they think Realtors are worthless) so they will NOT see the net price after subsidy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And my guess would be that only 50% of Realtors see the Subsidy. It depends how they have their searches set up. My search results have the subsidy right next to the close price. The default search burys it. So many lower tech agents might not see it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As for tax assessment tied to closing price, read the link to the blog &quot;Don&#039;t fight your tax assessment.&quot; Yes, you might save $5 a month, but then might lose several thousand.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question. Sorry for skipping over the definition. <br />A seller subsidy is when the seller pays for closing costs. Usually these are around 2%.</p>
<p>As for Realtors having access to the Seller Subsidy, yes they do. </p>
<p>But first of all, the buyer is the one that is frequently doing research (since they think Realtors are worthless) so they will NOT see the net price after subsidy.</p>
<p>And my guess would be that only 50% of Realtors see the Subsidy. It depends how they have their searches set up. My search results have the subsidy right next to the close price. The default search burys it. So many lower tech agents might not see it.</p>
<p>As for tax assessment tied to closing price, read the link to the blog &#8220;Don&#8217;t fight your tax assessment.&#8221; Yes, you might save $5 a month, but then might lose several thousand.</p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>Even though tax assesment can be off, it would still be helpful those bargain shoppers out there to be able to sort by the &quot;Listing Price / Tax Assesment&quot; column in spreadsheet view.  Savvy buyers will be able to look at a bogus number, but a good deal would still make it near the top of the list.  Also very curios about pre-MLS listings of the bank owned properties.  Where is this data going to come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though tax assesment can be off, it would still be helpful those bargain shoppers out there to be able to sort by the &#8220;Listing Price / Tax Assesment&#8221; column in spreadsheet view.  Savvy buyers will be able to look at a bogus number, but a good deal would still make it near the top of the list.  Also very curios about pre-MLS listings of the bank owned properties.  Where is this data going to come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newbie Buyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator>Newbie Buyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3085</guid>
		<description>What is a seller subsidy?   Suppose the house is not in need of major&lt;br/&gt;repairs.  I hope that&#039;s the case when I buy my first home.  What can the seller subsidize for me?  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You have mentioned in your blog before that realtors have access to the seller subsidy data on a given sale.  Wouldn&#039;t a perspective buyer (in the fute) have similar access?  This finding would expose the profit.  It would expose to future buyers of my house and my neighbors.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are tax assessment heavily influenced by home sales?  If so, I should intend to keep my home purchase as small as possible to pay lower property taxes in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a seller subsidy?   Suppose the house is not in need of major<br />repairs.  I hope that&#8217;s the case when I buy my first home.  What can the seller subsidize for me?  </p>
<p>You have mentioned in your blog before that realtors have access to the seller subsidy data on a given sale.  Wouldn&#8217;t a perspective buyer (in the fute) have similar access?  This finding would expose the profit.  It would expose to future buyers of my house and my neighbors.</p>
<p>Are tax assessment heavily influenced by home sales?  If so, I should intend to keep my home purchase as small as possible to pay lower property taxes in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRANK LL0SA Va Broker- BLOG.FranklyRealty.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/comment-page-1#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>FRANK LL0SA Va Broker- BLOG.FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>Hey Newbie, Why?&lt;br/&gt;Even if you bought it with 100% cash, I would stack the seller subsidy.&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;For example, Let&#039;s say the buyer and seller accept $400,000 net. I would adjust it to be $410,000 with $10k back. That way it records for $410k in the tax records.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So yeah sure, it won&#039;t help with your loan, like those putting 3% of 5% down, but it helps with resale.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Email me if you have a specific question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Newbie, Why?<br />Even if you bought it with 100% cash, I would stack the seller subsidy.</p>
<p>For example, Let&#8217;s say the buyer and seller accept $400,000 net. I would adjust it to be $410,000 with $10k back. That way it records for $410k in the tax records.</p>
<p>So yeah sure, it won&#8217;t help with your loan, like those putting 3% of 5% down, but it helps with resale.</p>
<p>Email me if you have a specific question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

