<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FranklyRealty.com Trust Me I'm A REALTOR &#187; Shady Agent Tricks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/category/shady-agent-tricks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Class Action Settlement for Illegal Kickbacks. Told Ya!</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2011/06/homewarranty-settlement.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2011/06/homewarranty-settlement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.franklyrealty.com/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ About time!
I called it in 2007 when I said that those $60-90 &#8220;processing fees&#8221; were illegal &#8220;kickbacks&#8221; that Realtors and Brokers got for pushing Home Warranty companies. (see 2007 post).
My exact words in 2007 in case you missed it: &#8220;I wouldn’t be surprised if soon there is a class action lawsuit that will come [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Kickback" src="http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/vv301/franklyrealty/samp58617b4dd58783a1.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="240" /> About time!</p>
<p>I called it in 2007 when I said that those $60-90 &#8220;processing fees&#8221; were illegal &#8220;kickbacks&#8221; that Realtors and Brokers got for pushing Home Warranty companies. (see <a title="Illegal kickbacks home warranty RESPA" href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/beware-of-affiliated-businesses.html" target="_blank">2007 post</a>).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">My exact words in 2007 in case you missed it:<em> &#8220;I wouldn’t be surprised if soon there is a <strong>class action lawsuit that will come after these firms <span style="color: #ff0000;">and the Realtors that are colluding</span> </strong>to the detriment of their client.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Well it finally happened. Of course the defendant doesn&#8217;t agree with or accept any responsibility. Here is the website announcing the<a href=" http://www.abneyclassaction.com" target="_blank"> class action settlement</a>. It is against AHS, the #1 home warranty company. The period is from May 2007 to Dec 2010. AHS was selling home warranties for $400 and giving the recommending broker $60 to $90 in &#8220;admin fees.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Kickbacks are illegal under RESPA (google it).</p>
<p>And in case you missed it, our &#8220;Excellence Comes Standard&#8221; &#8482; <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/03/client-bill-of-rights-can-your-agent.html">client bill of rights</a> #4 has always been, &#8220;No Home Warranty Kickbacks.&#8221; I know many might say &#8220;Duh, of course my agent should not be getting bribed,&#8221; but your Duh is not reality and yes agents get excited over $60. And yes it is only $60, but I think it <strong><span style="color: #008000;">signals a deeper problem of disclosure and fiduciary duty.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">&#8220;Are you working on my behalf of not!&#8221;</span></strong> $60 here and&#8230; $10,000 there when your agent throws you under the bus, without authorization, and tells the other agent you are willing to pay more. And don&#8217;t think I don&#8217;t see this a fair amount. (ie <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/for-realtors-sucky-listing-agents-i.html" target="_blank">sucky agents</a>)</p>
<p>(Focus Frank, focus) The settlement calls for about a $45 to $60 refund.</p>
<p>Here is the tricky part. The settlement says those that qualify are &#8220;settlement class member&#8217;s<em><strong> purchase of the home service</strong></em> contract.&#8221; [sic] And supposedly people are getting letters from AHS telling them that they may qualify. But where are those letters likely to go to? To the home being warrantied! Who<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> most likely bought</span></strong> the warranty?<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> The seller!</span></strong> Ha. The seller&#8217;s contact information is usually nowhere on the application to purchase the warranty. So how do THEY get paid. I know, kinda boring and academic, but interesting to me.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>What now? What is the latest trick or workaround?</strong></p>
<p>Now  the warranty firms (some stopped the practice) actually have the agent  &#8220;do something&#8221; so it won&#8217;t be considered an illegal kickback. Not sure  exactly what is done (if you know, add it to the comments). Probably it  will entail having the agent walk around the house and check off boxes.</p>
<p>What a mess.</p>
<p>Should have just followed my advice in 2007.</p>
<p><strong>Frank Borges LLosa </strong>J.D.</p>
<p>Broker <a href="http://FranklyRealty.com">FranklyRealty.com</a></p>
<p>Owner <a href="http://FranklyMLS.com">FranklyMLS.com</a></p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Hart" src="http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/vv301/franklyrealty/photo1.jpg" alt="" width="85" height="128" /></p>
<p>P.S. Hartly is almost one. <em>(pic by <a href="http://www.abbykellyphoto.com/" target="_blank">AbbyKellyPhoto</a>)</em></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2011%2F06%2Fhomewarranty-settlement.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2011%2F06%2Fhomewarranty-settlement.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2011/06/homewarranty-settlement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Admin Fees, MSNBC &amp; 515+ Comments.</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/admin-fees-msnbc-515-comments.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/admin-fees-msnbc-515-comments.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/12/admin-fees-msnbc-515-comments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed it, MSNBC&#8217;s front page linked to their RedTape blog which ran a little piece on bogus Admin fees. My 2007 admin fee post fueled part of the article. So far there are 515 comments over there, and 5,000 unique visitors over here.  
I hate admin fees. Never charged them, never [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_e3ac576e.gif"><img style="float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 170px; height: 42px; margin: 0 10px 10px 0;" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_e3ac576e.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a>In case you missed it, MSNBC&#8217;s front page linked to their RedTape blog which ran a little piece on<a href="http://redtape.msnbc.com/2008/07/traditionally-b.html" target="_blank"> bogus Admin fees</a>. My 2007<a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/395.html" target="_blank"> admin fee post</a> fueled part of the article. So far there are 515 comments over there, and 5,000 unique visitors over here. <strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>I hate admin fees. Never charged them, never <span id="more-162"></span>will.</strong> (kinda like Sprite)</p>
<p>Just a couple of corrections to my quotes in their post (which they are working on).<a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_hud1adminfee.gif"><img style="float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 111px; height: 157px; margin: 0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_hud1adminfee.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>1) I initially estimated that admin fees were charged on 40% of deals. I guess I was being conservative. That is actually more like<span style="color:#ff0000;"> </span><strong>70% based on 20 recent HUD1s</strong> that I pulled (not charged by us, but by the other broker). Also to clarify their post, I don&#8217;t know if these fees were agreed to in the initial consultation, or were just sprung up at closing.</p>
<p><em> (even if they were brought up initially, they are still bogus if the client doesn&#8217;t know better, ie they don&#8217;t <span style="font-weight:bold;color:#ff0000;">subscribe </span></em><em><span style="font-weight:bold;color:#ff0000;">via email</span> in the upper right corner of my</em><em> <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>. )</em></p>
<p>2) They quoted me as saying that &#8220;many agents&#8221; are <strong>allowed to keep the admin fees charged </strong>by brokers. I actually only know of 1 (maybe 2) agents/brokers that do that. If that was prevailant, it would be EVEN WORSE and I&#8217;d go and become a lawyer for the class action on that one! (oh yeah, I got into a law school. I start in the fall.)</p>
<p>But the point wasn&#8217;t missed in their post. Agents aren&#8217;t completely innocent in their &#8220;Sorry that is company policy to charge this.&#8221; excuse.<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Agents that are with firms that charge bogus admin fees are part of the blame.</strong></p>
<p>Why? Isn&#8217;t the broker solely to blame for charging this?</p>
<p>No. They are charging that fee, in part, because they can&#8217;t make enough from the agents. Why? <strong>Because the agents are demanding better splits.</strong> (and they have big offices)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Exaggerated Example/Scenario:</strong></span></p>
<p>Agent A is with 123 Realty that offers a<span style="color:#009900;font-weight:bold;"> 60/40% split</span> (firm get 40%). And this 123 Realty charges no admin fees to clients.<a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_ca37b839.jpg"><img style="float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 114px; height: 149px; margin: 0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_ca37b839.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_ca37b839.jpg"></a></p>
<p>Agent A <strong>gets courted to move over to 789 Realty.</strong> They offer<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#009900;"> 70/30%</span> split plus a $300 per deal admin fee (that either the agent or the client has to pay).</p>
<p>So when Agent A moves over to 789 Realty and then says to their client, <em>&#8220;Opps sorry, this firm charges $300 more per deal, nothing I can do about it. What? You want me to eat it? Heck no, that isn&#8217;t &#8216;fair&#8217;.&#8221;</em></p>
<p style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>Meanwhile on a $10,000 commission, the new company &#8220;gives&#8221; the agent $1,000 more.While charging $300 to their client.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Another thing that sucks about admin fees is I will see the<strong> SAME company charge them one day,</strong> <strong>and not charge them the next day with a different agent </strong>(at least not on the HUD1). So either the agent ate it offline (not HUD1) or they stood up to their broker and said,
</p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;text-align:center;">&#8220;Not only am I not paying this, but I&#8217;m not passing it on to my client. Mr(s). Broker, if you don&#8217;t do this, I&#8217;ll switch over to FranklyRealty.com <em>(if they will take me, no newbies sorry).&#8221;</em></p>
<p>But sometimes <strong>brokerages ARE to blame.</strong></p>
<p>Some brokers will start agents off with a 45/55% split (55% for the firm). But of course the $5,500 out of that $10,000 doesn&#8217;t cover &#8220;admin.&#8221; What? <strong>Is that $5,500 profit and the $300 is to cover xerox copies (admin)?</strong></p>
<p>Anyhow, thanks MSNBC  for blowing the cover off this garbage fee. I hope to help you expose more Realtor tricks.</p>
<p><strong>Tips for Realtors: </strong>Tell your broker no. But if you are on a 100% split paying $200 per month, you better believe they are going to charge &#8220;admin fees.&#8221; Or push you hard toward their <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/beware-of-affiliated-businesses.html" target="_blank">Affiliated Business</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Tips for Buyers:</strong> Hell no. Buyer Agents advertise their services as &#8220;free.&#8221; Not &#8220;Free*&#8221; with a $300 fee.</p>
<p>(I never say I&#8217;m &#8220;free.&#8221;  Yes technically the seller pays, but the buyer is the one writing a check at closing, and a part is coming to me. I realize that. Thank you. I hope I helped, and you found it worth it.)</p>
<p><strong>Tips for Sellers:</strong> Well this is tougher. At least they aren&#8217;t saying their services are &#8220;free.&#8221; They are saying their fees are XYZ% plus $300. You always have the right to go negotiate the commission split AND/OR the admin fee. But remember, that doesn&#8217;t mean the listing agent has to say &#8220;yes.&#8221; With your right to ask for less, is the agent&#8217;s right to say NO. (nothing wrong with <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/realtor-rebates-free-money-or-expensive.html" target="_blank">discounting or rebating. I write about it here&#8230;</a> <span style="font-style:italic;">&#8220;I used to do it&#8230; but then I got </span><span style="font-style: italic; text-decoration: line-through;">good</span><span style="font-style:italic;"> decent.&#8221;</span>)</p>
<p><strong>Tips for Brokers:</strong> Just because everyone else is doing it, that doesn&#8217;t make it right. Also go cut some overhead. The world is virtual. Get out of the 0.5 real estate world and join the Web 2.0 world.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>- Written by Frank Borges LL0SA- Broker <a href="http://franklyrealty.com%20/" target="_blank">FranklyRealty.com</a><br />
<span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="font-weight:normal;">(please report typos)</span></span><br />
</strong></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fadmin-fees-msnbc-515-comments.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fadmin-fees-msnbc-515-comments.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/admin-fees-msnbc-515-comments.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excellence Comes Standard. Frankly Client Bill of Rights, From The Real Estate Gadfly</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/03/client-bill-of-rights-can-your-agent.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/03/client-bill-of-rights-can-your-agent.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Listing Advice.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/excellence-comes-standard-frankly-client-bill-of-rights-from-the-real-estate-gadfly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Gadfly,&#8221; 1) a person  who upsets the status quo by stimulating innovation by proving an irritant. 2) any of  various flies, like a horsefly, that bite or annoy  livestock.

First JetBlue left  customers on the runway for 10 hours. After this disaster they came out with a JetBlue Bill of Rights.
Then a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_9a8e30f3.gif" alt="" width="159" height="160" align="left" /><em>&#8220;<strong>Gadfly</strong>,&#8221; 1) a person  who upsets the status quo by</em><em> stimulating</em><em> innovation by proving an irritant. </em><em>2) any of  various flies, like a hors</em><em>e</em><em>fly, that bite or annoy  livestock.</em></p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="billofrights_01" src="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/images-posts/billofrights_01.jpg" alt="billofrights_01" width="84" height="79" /></p>
<p>First <strong>JetBlue left  customers</strong> on the runway for 10 hours. After this disaster they came out with a JetBlue Bill of Rights.</p>
<p>Then a class action lawsuit was brought against C0ldwell  Banker (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/02/AR2007030200581_pf.html" target="_blank">Article</a>) for violating RESPA laws for steering clients to profit-sharing &#8220;partners.&#8221;</p>
<p>Before there is a further disastrous out lash from consumers against Realtors, we must adopt a new standard.  All shadiness needs to be removed from the industry and excellence should come standard.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.franklyrealty.com/">FranklyRealty.com</a> will start in Virginia, DC, MD and I envision shortly other firms will subscribe to the &#8220;Fran<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j3HXWqlgcs"><img src="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/images-posts/billofrights_02.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="right" /></a>kly Client Bill of Rights&#8221; throughout the country. This is not trademarked, go ahead copy me.  You&#8217;d be an idiot not to.</p>
<p><strong>Who will join us?</strong> Who runs a real estate firm that is willing to  follow our lead and offer a new elite level of service and disclosure?</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m honored to be the first to come out with this, <strong>I&#8217;m also embarrassed at the same time that this isn&#8217;t already the default.</strong> Consumers might read this and say &#8220;d&#8217;uh, seems obvious,&#8221; I agree! But why is it that not one real estate firm in America subscribe to this? YET!</p>
<p>Introducing the Frankly Client Bill of Rights:</p>
<p><strong>#1 No ABA&#8217;s, Affiliated Business Arrangements</strong><img src="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/images-posts/billofrights_03.jpg" alt=" " align="right" /></p>
<p>We make our money on the commission, we don&#8217;t need to make a few hundred bucks steering you. No &#8220;One Stop Shopping&#8221; filled with partners filling our pockets. (<a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/beware-of-affiliated-businesses.html" target="_blank">blog on ABAs</a>)</p>
<p><strong>#2 No Admin Fees</strong></p>
<p>These $200-$400 junk fees were invented by large real estate firms for both the buy and sell side. No more having clients sign confusing disclosures unknowingly. We don&#8217;t charge them, never have. (<a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/02/395.html" target="_blank">blog  on Admin Fees</a>)</p>
<p><strong>#3 No Dual Agency</strong></p>
<p>Dual Agency is<strong> ILLEGAL in some states</strong>. I wonder why? Dual Agency is when there is only one Realtor between a buyer and seller. A Dual Agency Realtor can not help both sides. So legally they are not allowed to represent EITHER SIDE, and instead &#8220;represent the contract&#8221; only. That makes the agent a mere worthless paper  pusher. We don&#8217;t do that. We will only represent our client, the buyer OR seller. In the case where a buyer comes without an agent, they will be an <strong>&#8220;unrepresented buyer&#8221; (like a FSBO)</strong> and will sign a disclosure  saying who we w<img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_65c8d935.jpg" alt=" " width="145" height="160" align="right" />ork  for.  (new blog soon)</p>
<p><strong>#4 No TELLING you what to pay</strong></p>
<p>We won&#8217;t tell you what to pay for a place. Ever! We won&#8217;t even answer the &#8220;What if you  were me&#8221; question, since&#8230; We aren&#8217;t you! It is your money, and your risk tolerance. Instead of telling you a price, we will go over a ton of data to consider and conclude with our <strong>&#8220;VEGAS ODDS SYSTEM&#8221;</strong> on what the  other side MIGHT do and separate it into three categories: Accept, Counter or  Walk. Ultimately you decide how aggressive you want to be. (<a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/dont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html" target="_blank">No  &#8220;selling&#8221; blog</a>)</p>
<p><strong>#5  No Home Warranty Insurance Kickbacks</strong></p>
<p>Even though it is illegal to receive a commission for selling insurance (unless you are a licensed insurance dealer), the Home Warranty companies have figured out a way to give agents and firms an <strong>&#8220;admin fee&#8221; of $60</strong> to sell  their goods. Why bother? We won&#8217;t accept that <strong>commission as we feel that is  illegal</strong>. Instead we will pass that &#8220;admin fee&#8221; to the buyer/seller. This might seem like a small amount, but the principle is what matters. Again we make our money on the commission, we don&#8217;t need to upsell you to make another $60.<img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_47d96096.jpg" alt=" " width="113" height="95" align="right" /></p>
<p><strong>#6  No Buyer Agent Bonuses/Bribes</strong></p>
<p>We outline our compensation up front in our Exclusive Buyer Agency Agreement  (<a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/02/exclusive-buyer-agency-contracts-dont.html">Don&#8217;t Sign Them Yet blog</a>).  If there is a bonus to the buyer  agent, the buyer gets that in a form of a rebate on the HUD1. <strong>We can&#8217;t  be bribed</strong> to push you into a particular listing. (<a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2006/12/shady-realtor-bonuses-10-free-cruise-be.html" target="_blank">blog  on 10% agent bribes</a>)<strong><img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_1CollageOdyssey-1.jpg" alt=" " width="160" height="107" align="right" /></strong></p>
<p><strong>#7  30 Photos &amp; </strong><strong>Custom Domain Name Website Per Listing</strong></p>
<p>It boggles my mind when a $900,000 listing posts 3 photos taken with a camera  phone (see <a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/for-realtors-sucky-listing-agents-i.html" target="_blank">Sucky  Agents</a>) and then wonders why it didn&#8217;t sell for 2<a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/RbFsAB402mI/AAAAAAAAANk/Kcp7bXQtFmc/s400/shoot.jpg"><img src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/RbFsAB402mI/AAAAAAAAANk/Kcp7bXQtFmc/s400/shoot.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>00 days. And this is from a &#8220;Top 3&#8243; large company, not a &#8220;discounter.&#8221; They even allow agents to check a default button to allow the MLS to dispatch a high school photographer to take a free exterior shot. I call this the free drive-by shooting option.</p>
<p>Simple new requirement: Each listing must have  <strong>at least 20</strong> photos taken with a 22mm wide angle camera (like the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000CD6B3A?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=frareablo-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B000CD6B3A">v570</a>) or from  a professional photographer.</p>
<p>Each listing will also have their <strong>own domain name</strong>. No need to point prospects to &#8220;HugeRealEstateCompany.com&#8221; just to get lost looking at another 10,000 homes. Instead prospects can go directly to the photos of the listing with their own domain like: 2001OdysseyUNIT X.com<a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/Ra6Tmh402cI/AAAAAAAAALY/iGNAr78-D6Y/s320/staged.jpg"><img src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/Ra6Tmh402cI/AAAAAAAAALY/iGNAr78-D6Y/s320/staged.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>#8 Professional Staging</strong><br />
<a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/Ra6Tmh402cI/AAAAAAAAALY/iGNAr78-D6Y/s1600-h/staged.jpg"> </a></p>
<p>We won&#8217;t list a house unless we can make it look better than a model home.  Why? It works. It gets you more money and the house sells faster. (See <a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/listing-case-study.html" target="ew">Bidding War blog</a>). Just yesterday we got 3 offers in 3 days for $20k over what other Realtors said would be the seller&#8217;s top price (referrals available).</p>
<p><strong>#9 You&#8217;re High Tech, We&#8217;re High Tech</strong></p>
<p>How about <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">100% paperless</span></strong> transactions from start to close? No unnecessary &#8220;meeting to sign&#8221; papers or trips to Kinkos. We also use instant messaging, cell text messaging and of course email&#8230; from our phone. Prefer <img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_32699470_99027d8691_o.jpg" alt=" " width="88" height="116" align="right" />paper?  We can do that too.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_a29ff720.jpg" alt="" width="107" height="75" align="left" />Thank you for following Blog.FranklyRealty.com as we recalibrate the real estate industry! Sign up via for updates or email this to a friend.</em></span></strong></p>
<p>Are you a buyer or seller? Print this out, have your Realtor sign  the Frankly Client Bill of Rights? (Tell me how it goes)</p>
<p>Are you a Realtor with another firm that can&#8217;t promise the above? Then switch or start your own, maybe I&#8217;ll even help you!</p>
<p>Thanks for all the comments, keep em coming. And if you like this blog, please pass it on! Oh and tell me if you find typos, I don&#8217;t like looking dumb.</p>
<p><strong>Written by Frank Borges LLosa- The Real Estate  Gadfly<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Virginia Broker/ Owner</strong> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://franklyrealty.com/" target="_blank">FranklyRealty.com</a></p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/" target="_blank">Blog.FranklyRealty.com</a> Featured in  BusinessWeek, CNBC, WSJ etc.</p>
<p><img src="http://franklyrealty.com/logos/Logo-07-Inch-GIF-2k.gif" alt="" width="139" height="87" /></p>
<p>p.s. #10 As with JetBlue, we also promise not to leave you on the runway for 10  hours.</p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F03%2Fclient-bill-of-rights-can-your-agent.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F03%2Fclient-bill-of-rights-can-your-agent.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/03/client-bill-of-rights-can-your-agent.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$395 Realty Firm&#039;s &quot;Admin Fee&quot;: Junk or Legit? (Update: Now called &#8220;Additional Commission&#8221;)</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/395.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/395.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/395-realty-firms-admin-fee-junk-or-legit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 3/2011: Admin fees are now being called &#8220;Additional Commissions&#8221; after a few lost class action suits against &#8220;admin fees.&#8221;
Somebody must be reading this (actually 60 people a day) since this GREAT question came in.
Q. My listing agent is taking commission plus a $395 administrative fee. What is the administrative fee all about?

Great question! Why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_coin.gif" alt="" align="left" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">Update 3/2011: Admin fees are now being called &#8220;Additional Commissions&#8221; after a few lost class action suits against &#8220;admin fees.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>Somebody must be reading this (actually 60 people a day) since this GREAT question came in.<img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_hud1adminfee.gif" alt="" align="right" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Q. My listing agent is taking commission <span style="color:#ff0000;">plus a $395 administrative fee</span>. What is the administrative fee all about?<br />
<span style="font-weight:bold;"><br />
</span></span>Great question! Why didn&#8217;t I think of that?<br />
First of all I don&#8217;t know what you mean by &#8220;taking.&#8221; If you are telling me that you signed a listing agreement for a certain percentage and the <span style="font-weight:bold;">$395 was NOT mentioned</span> in there, and suddenly <span style="font-weight:bold;">you are expected to pay</span> it at the closing, I think your exact words should be <span style="font-weight:bold;color:#ff0000;">&#8220;over my dead </span> body.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-style:italic;color:#6600cc;font-size:85%;">Shameless plug: FranklyRealty.com has never charged an Administrative fee. I just never understood what it was. It is a junk fee, but allowed if you agree to it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">What is an administrative fee?</span></p>
<p>It is a fee that is supposed to cover &#8220;the cost of paper and tools, etc.&#8221; Um, but don&#8217;t they also get a BIG chunk of the commission too? Yes, so it is a fluff fee to increase revenue.  A fee that is easy to slip past the client that might not know better, so why not charge it?<br />
<img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_IceCreamCone.jpg" alt="" align="right" /></p>
<ul>
<li>Thank God you have this Blog to get the<span style="font-weight:bold;"> inside scoop.</span><br />
<span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="color:#6600cc;font-size:85%;">Shameless plug #2</span></span><span style="color:#6600cc;font-size:85%;"> If you are</span><span style="color:#6600cc;font-size:85%;"> smart, you&#8217;ll sign up for future blogs to be emailed to you (at the bottom). I apologize for</span><span style="color:#6600cc;font-size:85%;"> all these plugs on this particular blog, and I know blogs aren&#8217;t supposed to be self promotional, but when 70% of the competition does shady stuff like this, I just can&#8217;t contain myself.)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">How do they get away with this fee 70% of the time?</span></p>
<p>While everyone knows there is competition for which agent you pick, there is another round of competition that you might not know about. It is the <span style="font-weight:bold;">competition amongst brokerage</span> firms to get the top producing agents to work for them. Different firms have different split structures. Some start with <span style="font-weight:bold;">50% going to the firm and 50% going to the agent</span> (and they need an admin on top of that, give me a break!).  And this 50/50 split is for deals that the agent finds on their own! It drops even more if the firm gave them the deals. And it cuts in HALF for the first couple of deals since a mentor gets a portion. Yes, a new agent can get as low as 20% of the commission, I saw it in real life. A friend/new Realtor <span style="font-weight:bold;color:#ff0000;">walked out with a $2,100 check on a $10,000 commission</span> that she brought to the firm.<span style="font-weight:bold;"> And you all thought we had it easy!!</span></p>
<p>So one way firms<span style="font-weight:bold;"> lure agents in is with more competitive splits</span>. Some firms recruit newbies at 50% splits,  and some take experienced agents and only charge 5%, plus &#8220;desk fees.&#8221; But wait. They have to make money somehow.</p>
<p>So many firms started with &#8220;admin&#8221; fees to subsidize the brokers (because the agents wanted higher splits) and now they also do it with ABA&#8217;s (see Blog: <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/beware-of-affiliated-businesses.html" target="ee">&#8220;Affiliated Business&#8221; or Illegal Kickbacks?</a>)  So one could say that the brokerages didn&#8217;t need to charge that if the agent split was lower and more profitable. So while the agent pitches it as <span style="font-style:italic;">&#8220;oh the broker charges that, I can&#8217;t do anything about it,&#8221; </span>they in the meantime are charged less by the broker.<span style="font-weight:bold;"> So indirectly that admin fee goes to the agent, in the form of lower fees to them</span><span style="font-weight:bold;">.</span> Have I confused you yet?</p>
<ul><span style="font-weight:bold;">Here is how the conversation probably started:</span></p>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Agent:</span> Dear Broker, I need a better split.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Broker:</span> But I&#8217;m not making enough money at this rate.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Agent:</span> Do better or I will leave.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Broker: </span>Hold on, I&#8217;ll give you a better split but you will have to pass on a $395 fee to your clients that would go directly to us.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Agent: </span>Deal! Where do I sign?</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Agent to Client:</span> Oh, that Admin fee is for the broker to cover costs of doing business.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Client: </span>Um, ok.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Client&#8217;s friend:</span> You should have read Blog.FranklyRealty.com<img src="http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/hud1adminfee.gif" alt="" align="right" /></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">How common is the Admin Fee and where should I look for it?</span></p>
<p>I spoke to 2 closing companies. Both agreed that the range was<span style="font-weight:bold;"> from $195 to $395 and they were on <span style="color:#ff0000;">70% of closings,</span></span> and they were on both the listing side AND the buying side.  I had never seen them on the buying agent side, news to me. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Heck, maybe I should start charging this!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;color:#ff0000;">What can you do?</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Net everything out. If your listing agent is charging x% plus $395, add it up. And question it to see their recorded pitch.</li>
<li>If you <span style="font-weight:bold;">never signed anything allowing that fee, make the agent eat it.</span> This is like a lender giving you a good faith estimate and suddenly adding an admin fee.</li>
<li>It is up to you if you wish to ask for the<span style="font-weight:bold;"> fee to be waived if it WAS disclosed.</span> I go back and forth on the ethics behind this since you DID agree to it. But maybe you were tricked into it? One closing company told me that 10% of agents eat this fee since some are embarrassed by the fee and sometimes because a customer won&#8217;t pay it.</li>
<li>Pick a firm that doesn&#8217;t<span style="font-weight:bold;"> nickel and dime</span> you. If they are pulling this fast one on you, what else are they pulling?</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Again, they might say, &#8220;it is for the cost of paper and tools, etc.&#8221; Your response is, &#8220;Out of this $10,000 commission, don&#8217;t they already get a large portion? I won&#8217;t pay that fee.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>Good luck and let me know how it goes!</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">- Written by Frank Borges LL0SA- Broker/Owner </span><a href="http://franklyrealty.com/" target="new">FranklyRealty.com</a><br />
703-827-4OO6 Please report all typos, I don&#8217;t like looking stupid. If you like this post, sign up for new blogs daily.</p>
<p>Videos at <a href="http://youtube.franklyrealty.com/" target="new">YouTube.FranklyRealty.com</a><br />
<em></em><br />
<span style="color:#6600cc;"><span style="font-weight:bold;">Receive future blogs (spam-free) </span></span> <span style="font-size:78%;"><br />
<a href="http://www.feedblitz.com/f?previ ewfeed=142497" target="ss">Preview</a></span></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F02%2F395.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F02%2F395.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/395.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware: New Constructions Illegally Not Disclosing Seller Subsidies</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/beware-arlington-condos-new.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/beware-arlington-condos-new.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying Risks.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New construction tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2007/02/03/beware-new-constructions-illegally-not-disclosing-seller-subsidies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Thank you to MRIS for warning agents about illegal MLS fudging, perhaps due to BusinessWeek&#8217;s story that referred to my blog. More at the end)*
Now I have reported to MRIS another violation.Lets see what they do about it.
New Construction Fudging the Reporting of Seller Subsidy&#8230; how conveeee&#8230;.enient.


Before I get started on tricks that the builders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_Arlington_condos.gif"><img style="float:left;width:66px;cursor:pointer;height:167px;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" alt="" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_Arlington_condos.gif" border="0" /></a><img style="width:130px;height:152px;" src="http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/finger.gif" align="right" /><span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">(Thank you to MRIS</span><span style="font-style:italic;"> for warning agents about illegal MLS fudging, perhaps due to BusinessWeek&#8217;s story that referred to my blog. More at the end)*</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Now I have reported to MRIS another violation.<br /></span>Lets see what they do about it.</p>
<p>New Construction Fudging the Reporting of Seller Subsidy&#8230; how conveeee&#8230;.<span>enient.
<div style="text-align:center;">
<div style="text-align:center;">
<div style="text-align:left;">Before I get started on tricks that the builders are using to unload inventory, did you know that it <span style="font-weight:bold;">doesn&#8217;t cost you anything to have a Realtor represent you? </span>The cost is the same to the buyer, oftentimes the on-site sales agent gets the double commission. Sometimes a &#8220;free&#8221; buyer agent can save you even more, even if you think you already<span style="font-weight:bold;"> squeezed $100k out of them</span>, who cares, if your buyer agent knows they recently <span style="font-weight:bold;">dropped a place $200k </span>around the corner. Price drops are relative, and a good Realtor can help protect you. See <a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/i-need-buyers-agent-but-for-my-car.html">I Need A Buyer&#8217;s Agent! But For My Car.</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align:left;">So back to<span style="font-weight:bold;"> builder fudging. </span>On the MLS, when a listing closes<span style="font-weight:bold;"> a Realtor must enter in the closed price.</span> This can easily be verified by the tax records once it comes out. A Realtor is <span style="font-weight:bold;">also <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">required to post the seller subsidy</span></span> amount. The &#8220;seller subsidy&#8221; is the &#8220;cash back to buyer&#8221; or &#8220;cash toward closing costs&#8221; and it is a marketing scheme to make a listing look more favorable, even though I tell my buyers to ignore them and just to net everything out. A $515k place with $15k back should be viewed as a $500k. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Don&#8217;t let that marketing confuse you.</span></div>
<p>
<ul>
<li>Damn side note: I once had a listing for $325,000 and an agent said<span style="font-style:italic;"> &#8220;but the developer is offering an amazing $15,000 in incentives, will you match that?&#8221;</span> The builder&#8217;s price was $350,000. I said<span style="font-style:italic;"> &#8220;Sure. I&#8217;ll double it! I&#8217;ll give you $30,000 back with a price of $355,000, Deal?&#8221; </span>So make sure you NET everything out!</li>
</ul>
<p>
<div style="text-align:left;">Anyhow,<span style="font-weight:bold;"> the builders are in a bad situation right now.</span> Especially Arlington County condos in Virignia. They have already sold a ton of units at a great price, but they need to sell the rest of their inventory without pissing off the current owners and people under contract.</p>
<p><img src="http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/Arlington_condos.gif" align="left" /><span style="font-weight:bold;">So how do they do this?<br /></span>Well one way is through fudging the &#8220;seller subsidy&#8221;. If a place is $600,000 and they want to drop the price to $580,000, they will instead give $20,000 worth of &#8220;seller subsidies&#8221; or &#8220;cash back.&#8221; Effectively the sale is $580,000, but it gets recorded in the tax records as $600,000 (which is fine). <span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">The part that is not fine is they are leaving off the subsidy information on the MLS</span>. <span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">Insert Dr. Evil&#8217;s voice: How convenient</span><span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">!</span></div>
<p>
<div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-weight:bold;">How do I know they are fudging the MLS?</span>
<ul>
<li>The graph to the left shows one builder&#8217;s last 40 sales. Not one included a seller subsidy. Meanwhile I have been in their sales office. As with EVERY builder, they give huge seller subsidies. Yet <span style="font-weight:bold;">not one is posted here, as required by the MLS.</span></li>
<li>The box on the right side of the graph are 50 Arlington Condos sold in 2006. About 40% have seller subsidies.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Why does seller subsidy disclosure matter?</span><br />If you are considering buying a $500k condo in Arlington, you will look at the past sales as one of a dozen metrics to value a home<span style="font-style:italic;"> (I wish I could show all my tricks on pricing and offering on homes, but the competition might be</span><img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_Honda20Civic203.jpg" align="right" /><span style="font-style:italic;"> reading this, email me if you want a sample). </span>If the builder just sold a nearly exact unit for $500,000 and recorded no subsidy, you might actually consider buying the unit near $500k. <span style="font-weight:bold;">However, if you knew that there was $20,000 cash back,</span> and the net price was actually $480,000, that is basically a <span style="font-weight:bold;">Honda Civic </span><span style="font-weight:bold;">value of information ($20k)</span>.</p>
<p>So in conclusion, make sure your buyer agent knows the market well and knows about tricks like those and other listing agent <span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">tricks that could cost you $20,000.</span></p>
<p>For all those super smart people that think like my Mom (<a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/dont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html">read Mom Blog on not trusting Realtors</a>) did <span style="font-weight:bold;">&#8220;I don&#8217;t need no stinking buyer agent,&#8221; </span>this stuff happens all the time. (shameless plug here: sign up to get emails of new blogs, the sign up box is at the bottom)</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-weight:bold;">And you all think all we do is push paper and get you to buy quickly?</span><br /><img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_Press16-08-04.jpg" align="middle" /></div>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">- Written by Frank Borges LL0SA- Broker/Owner </span><a href="http://franklyrealty.com/" target="new">FranklyRealty.com</a><br />703-827-4OO6 Please report all typos, I don&#8217;t like looking stupid. If you like this post, sign up for new blogs daily, use the form on the right of the page.</p>
<p>Videos at <a href="http://youtube.franklyrealty.com/" target="new">YouTube.FranklyRealty.com</a><br /><i><span style="font-size:78%;color:silver;"><br /></span></i><span style="font-size:85%;">*Thank you to MRIS continued: I would like to </span><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:85%;">thank MRIS</span><span style="font-size:85%;"> for warning agents about MLS fudging.(the local MLS system) for posting a bulletin board on Matrix (the back end Realtor system) warning listing agents that</span><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:85%;"> Data MLS fudging is illegal</span><span style="font-size:85%;"> and will not be tolerated. I believe my</span><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:85%;"> MLS Data fudging Blog</span><span style="font-size:85%;"> (<a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/mls-data-fudging-by-realtors-watch-out.html">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/part-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-of-time.html">Part 2</a>) and the resulting</span><span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:italicfont-size:85%;"> Business Week </span><span style="font-size:85%;">article probably lit a fire under them. While I wanted to copy and paste that notice, </span><span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:85%;">it wa<br />
s gone after 24 hours. Oh well. <span style="font-style:italic;">Update:</span> I found the<a href="http://www.nvar.com/newsdetail.lasso?articleno=nvarn100785" target="de"> link to the notice.</a> </span><br /><a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/rss.xml"></a><br /><span style="color:rgb(102,0,204);"><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subscribe via email to this blog<br /></span></span> <i><span style="font-size:78%;"> spam free</span></i><span style="font-size:78%;"><br /><a href="http://www.feedblitz.com/f?previewfeed=142497" target="ss">Preview</a> </span><span style="font-size:+0;"></span><i><span style="font-size:78%;color:silver;">Keywords: Housing bubble? Arlington, Alexandria, mls, homes, Real estate, Virginia, Alexandria, 22201, 22314, Fairfax Va, DC Realty, Realtor</span></i></div>
</div>
<p></span></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F02%2Fbeware-arlington-condos-new.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F02%2Fbeware-arlington-condos-new.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/beware-arlington-condos-new.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware: &quot;Affiliated Business&quot; or Illegal Kickbacks?</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/beware-of-affiliated-businesses.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/beware-of-affiliated-businesses.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/beware-affiliated-business-or-illegal-kickbacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walks like a Duck, talks like a Duck&#8230;There is a booming new business that consumers deserve to fully understand. It is called an &#8220;Affiliated Business Arrangement&#8221; or ABA.  A new stream of income for some Realtors. You deserve full disclosure and whether your Realtor is getting an indirect kickback  from his &#8220;recommended partners&#8221;&#8220;Affiliated&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_yellow20ducks.jpg" align="left" /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,204,0);">Walks like a Duck, talks like a Duck&#8230;</span><br />There is a <span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(204,0,0);">booming new business</span> that consumers deserve to fully understand. It is called an &#8220;<span style="font-weight:bold;">Affiliated Business Arrangement&#8221; or ABA.  </span>A new stream of income for some Realtors. You deserve full disclosure and whether <span style="font-weight:bold;">your Realtor is getting an indirect kickback </span> from his &#8220;recommended partners&#8221;<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br />&#8220;Affiliated&#8221; businesses. Are they a Godsend, barely legal, just plain illegal, or just unethical?</span><br /><span>
<p><strong>FIRST OF ALL LETS DEFINE RESPA? </strong>(The law designed to stop kickbacks)</p>
<ul style="font-style:italic;">
<li>&#8220;<strong>RESPA</strong> is about closing costs and settlement procedures. <strong>RESPA</strong> requires that consumers receive disclosures at various times in the transaction and <strong>outlaws kickbacks</strong> that increase the cost of settlement services.&#8221; <a href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/res/respa_hm.cfm">Respa website</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Could a Realtor that is in &#8220;partnership&#8221; with a Title company, please help me understand <strong>why it is ok to skirt around this law</strong><span style="font-weight:bold;">? </span>More frequently I am finding large real estate companies (and the agents) &#8220;partnering&#8221; with settlement companies and doing so in a manner that <strong>technically gets them around the kickback laws.</strong></p>
<p><strong>One Real Estate company even uses the loophole as a recruiting technique:</strong></p>
<ul style="font-style:italic;">
<li><strong> &#8220;</strong><strong>Mortgage and Title Income </strong>. We share income with our agents under a RESPA compliant platform. As the leader in this field we have developed the only legal way to offer you this additional income.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color:rgb(153,51,0);"><span style="font-weight:bold;">Yippee!!! Translation:</span> </span>&#8220;We are smart, cunning and sneaky enough to have figured out a loophole to get around the basic intent of the law&#8230; at least for now or until we get caught.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Another website lists </span>the following reason for agents to join their Real Estate company:</p>
<ul style="font-style:italic;">
<li>&#8220;Does the company own affiliated businesses? Do the agents share in this?&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>But I thought the earlier company was the only one that knew how to do it legally?<br /></strong></p>
<p><strong>RATS!</strong><a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_rats.gif"><img style="display:block;text-align:center;cursor:pointer;width:104px;height:82px;margin:0 auto 10px;" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_rats.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>So the law was designed to stop Real Estate Agents from getting a $100 or $300 incentive to drive business to a particular Title company. Yet that doesn&#8217;t stop the &#8220;brilliant&#8221; realty firms that found a loophole around this. </p>
<p><strong>This is one of the loopholes as I barely understand it:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong></strong>The agent becomes a<strong> tiny % part owner in the settlement company&#8217;s newly</strong><a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_percent.gif"><img style="float:right;cursor:pointer;width:98px;height:96px;margin:0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_percent.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a><strong> formed subsidiary LLC</strong> . I don&#8217;t have the exact details, but this part ownership <strong>is a legal way for them to get an indirect kickback, </strong>since revenue can&#8217;t go to agents unless they happen to own part of the company. So while they don&#8217;t get directly $300 per deal, they get a year end revenue share that is <span style="font-weight:bold;">somehow tied to the # of closings</span> with that company. <span style="font-style:italic;">One Realtor said it isn&#8217;t tied to that, but I would have to see details before I believed that an agent would be allowed to own a part of 1 title company, while sending ALL your business to another</span></li>
<li><span>And once the new year hits, a <span style="font-weight:bold;">newly formed LLC is created</span> to bring on new agents.<br /></span></li>
</ul>
<p>So please, agents that are part of these big companies, please help me <strong>understand how you rationalize this. </strong>While some of you might say that you have the client sign a disclosure form, how many of you with a straight face can tell me that your client &#8220;gets&#8221; that you are making $300 off them if they go with a particular company? As if we don&#8217;t make enough money on the deal, we need to <span style="font-weight:bold;">bilk them for a couple hundred more bucks</span>?</p>
<p style="font-weight:bold;">Most buyers sign that disclosure because:</p>
<ul>
<li>They think it is normal and are already signing 20 documents </li>
<li>They feel pressured into it or confused</li>
<li>They can&#8217;t read between the lines that say: &#8220;Your Realtor makes $300 if you use XYZ&#8221;</li>
<li>They have no other alternatives.</li>
</ul>
<p>Instead of the intent of the disclosure which is to let people understand that they have a choice and that their<span style="font-weight:bold;"> agent </span>makes money if you sign that paper. Note that it used to be more common for the firm to make money, and not the agent. Now firms are sharing that money back with the agents as a recruiting technique.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">What can you do? </span><span style="font-style:italic;">(I&#8217;m not one to bitch about something and not give suggested remedies</span>)
<ol>
<li>Avoid the companies that have these ABAs. If they do shady things like this, what else are they going to do that is shady? (see blog on <a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2006/12/shady-realtor-bonuses-10-free-cruise-be.html">Shady 10% Buyer Agent Bonuses</a> or the blog <a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/dont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html">&#8220;Don&#8217;t Trust Realtors that Sell You on Buying</a>&#8220;)</li>
<li>Demand that the Realtor put in writing exactly how much they are getting (once you get that in writing, send it to me to review)</li>
<li>Ask the Realtor how he can justify this bonus/kickback/revenue share if he already agreed in another contract that a) he was making X% and b) working for you, the buyer.</li>
<li>Demand that bonus in the form of a Rebate back to the buyer.</li>
<li>If he won&#8217;t rebate his bonus, use another settlement company.</li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br />Aren&#8217;t you just jealous that you don&#8217;t have these partnerships? </span><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">No</span>.  I could easily get them and I have been offered them.</p>
<p>The conversation goes like this (but with a lender),
<ul>
<li>Lender: &#8220;Let us be your in house lender and  you can get 35% of the revenue&#8221;, </li>
<li>I say: &#8220;Um, don&#8217;t you have to make a living and won&#8217;t that fee have to be passed on to the client?&#8221;</li>
<li>Lender: &#8220;No, I&#8217;ll give them a great rate and you make $500&#8243;</li>
<li>I say: &#8220;So why don&#8217;t I just pass on the kickback and you give the savings to the customer?&#8221;</li>
<li>Lender: &#8220;Ok, lets do it!&#8221;</li>
<li>I say: &#8220;No thanks, I don&#8217;t trust kickbacks, so how can I trust that you wouldn&#8217;t just charge $500 more (which is REALLY easy to do with loans as the fees can be hidden in a dozen places including a slightly higher rate)</li>
</ul>
<p>Ok some Realtors getting revenue sharing might say <span style="font-weight:bold;">&#8220;but the price is the same everywhere,&#8221;</span> don&#8217;t believe your<span style="font-weight:bold;"> own BS</span>. In the long term this is price fixing, limiting choices and a RESPA violation. When you limit competition through Realtor bribes, the consumer is hurt.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">If an agent isn&#8217;t sharing reve<br />
nue, but the firm has an ABA? Still watch out!</span>
<p>Ok some real estate companies won&#8217;t pay the agents a cut (they claim it is not legal, how convenient), but instead of rewards, they punish. They shun the Realtor if they don&#8217;t use their ABA partner. One large NoVa company stripped a top agent of her &#8220;#1 in office&#8221; title for not using the Affiliated Partners on her deals. How is that in the best interest of the client? So even if a Realtor doesn&#8217;t get paid, you have to wonder what it in it for them to push the ABA.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if soon there is a <strong>class action lawsuit that will come after these firms <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">and the Realtors that are colluding</span> </strong>to the detriment of their client.</p>
<p>Are you ok with the &#8220;one stop shop&#8221;, even if the price is the same to you and your Realtor gets a bonus?</p>
<p>Oh and don&#8217;t get me started about <span style="font-weight:bold;">$400 Home Warranties </span>that frequently result in a $70 bonus to the company, and oftentimes passed back to an agent. Note that insurance can only be sold through licensed insurance dealers. Yet these 15% bribes are called &#8220;admin fees.&#8221;  If an agent is selling you on a warranty, ask if he or the firm makes a cut on your sale, and ask for that bonus back.</p>
<p>If you have questions about something that seems shady, ask me, I&#8217;ll give you the inside scoop.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">- Frank Borges LL0SA &#8211; Broker FranklyRealty.com</span></p>
<p><img style="display:none;" src="http://franklyrealty.com/logo/smallLogo.gif" /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(102,0,204);">If you like these topics, subscribe to get a spam-free digest of new postings:</span><span><i><span style="font-size:78%;"> spam free </span></i></span><span style="font-size:78%;"><a href="http://www.feedblitz.com/f?previewfeed=142497" target="ss">Preview</a> </span><span> </span><span style="font-size:78%;">Please email me any typos!</span><br /></span></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fbeware-of-affiliated-businesses.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fbeware-of-affiliated-businesses.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/beware-of-affiliated-businesses.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tip #1 From Mom: Don&#039;t Trust Realtors That &quot;Sell&quot; You On Buying.</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/dont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/dont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying Risks.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/tip-1-from-mom-dont-trust-realtors-that-sell-you-on-buying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I learned my approach to Real Estate from my mother growing up buying homes (insert &#8220;awe&#8221; here).
A Realtor&#8217;s job shouldn&#8217;t be to talk people into buying. However too frequently you&#8217;ll hear Realtors saying &#8220;Now is the time to buy&#8221; or &#8220;We have reached bottom.&#8221; Maybe they believe it, maybe they are brainwashed, or maybe they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/Ra4zBB401PI/AAAAAAAAABg/QTVelqj67FQ/s1600-h/mom.jpg"><img style="float:left;cursor:pointer;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/Ra4zBB401PI/AAAAAAAAABg/QTVelqj67FQ/s200/mom.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><b>I learned my approach to Real Estate from my mother growing up buying homes (insert &#8220;awe&#8221; here).</b></p>
<p>A Realtor&#8217;s job shouldn&#8217;t be to talk people into buying. However too frequently you&#8217;ll hear Realtors saying &#8220;Now is the time to buy&#8221; or &#8220;We have reached bottom.&#8221; Maybe they believe<span> it, maybe they are brainwashed, or maybe they are lying. Irregardlessly* in reality <b>Realtors don&#8217;t know where the market will be in 1 month, 1 year, 5 years or 10</b>, and don&#8217;t believe somebody whose pitch is always <b>the same&#8230; UP!</b> <span style="font-size:85%;">(*yes that is a made up word to see if you were paying attention) </span></p>
<p>What many Realtor know is if they can convince you to buy, they <b>might make another sale! <span style="color:red;"> More Sales = More $ for the Realtor</span></b></p>
<p>One lesson stood out most from my mother&#8230;</p>
<p><i>On a sunny spring day in 1995, my mother was working with her Buyer Agent Realtor, about to put in an offer. The Realtor kept looking over my mother&#8217;s shoulder as she was deciding on a price to offer on a house. The Realtor was not the Listing Agent, but her Buyer Agent (supposedly looking after her best interest). The <b>Buyer Agent Realtor kept saying in a &#8220;salesy&#8221; fashion: &#8220;$XYZ would be a great price!&#8221;</b>, or &#8220;You will make a ton in 2-3 years!&#8221; and &#8220;You should put $XYZ!&#8221;</p>
<p><b>My mother stopped her and said, &#8220;Let me ask you some questions,</b><br /></i>
<ol>
<li><i> &#8220;You will make money if I buy this house right?&#8221;<br />The agent replied &#8220;Yes&#8221;<br /></i></li>
<li><i> &#8220;Will you be sharing in my risk if this property goes down?&#8221;<br />The agent replied &#8220;Sorry, No&#8221;<br /></i></li>
<li><i> &#8220;Will you be making <b>more</b> money, the higher this offer is?&#8221;<br />The agent replied &#8220;Yes&#8221;<br /></i></li>
<li><i> &#8220;Is the % likelihood of this deal being accepted go up with every $5,000 higher  that you recommend we put in here? And thus the more likelihood of you getting paid?&#8221; The agent replied &#8220;Yes&#8221;
<p><span style="color:red;"><b>&#8220;Then please be quiet and let me think.&#8221;</b> </span><br />(she probably wasn&#8217;t as nice as that).<br /></i></li>
</ol>
<p><i><br /></i><br /><span style="font-size:78%;">Warning, blatant subliminal sales pitch approaching:</span> When it comes to price, a <b>Realtor&#8217;s job should be to delivery information, not suggestions</b>.<br />The Realtor might use their experience and compare <b>the bidding process to a trip to Vegas</b> and say &#8220;at this price you might have a 25% chance of getting it, at this price an 80%&#8221;, but <b>when asked &#8220;What should I pay?&#8221; a Realtor shouldn&#8217;t answer that</b> since they have a bias and it isn&#8217;t their money. Only the buyer knows their risk levels, how the monthly payments will feel, and how much they love the place.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, a good Realtor can help you get a lower price (ask for some testimonials) and come up with a strategy to do such, but they should <b>not</b> say &#8220;If I were you I would bid $XYZ.&#8221; Trust me (never trust anybody that says &#8220;Trust me&#8221;), the higher the price, the easier the job.<span style="color:red;"> Fighting to get that last $5k or $10k is the toughest part</span>*, but important especially if the market goes down more, you&#8217;ll be glad you fought for that last $10k.<br />(*Note that some people would rather just buy at full price and have an easy transaction, we can do those too, whatever is important to the buyer.)</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really list all the insider buyer agent techniques on a public Blog being read by my competition, but one example would be to not stop at finding one great home, but finding 2 or 3 houses and <b>taking a &#8220;round robin&#8221; approach</b>. Offering a price on one, and if that doesn&#8217;t work, bid on the next one, then the next and then back to the first with a slightly higher price and <b>repeat as necessary</b> (are you really supposed to &#8220;shampoo and repeat?&#8221;) until somebody bites.</p>
<p>And lastly, <span style="color:red;">don&#8217;t trust any data from NAR</span>, The National Association of Realtors. Just don&#8217;t do it. Ignore it. As Peter Coy wrote in Jan 8th&#8217;s BusinessWeek, NAR said on 12-12-05 Prediction: &#8220;The national median home price will rise about 6.1% in 2006. Over a full year, it has never declined since good record keeping began in 1968&#8243;- NAR. This was followed up by &#8220;The Reality: Through October (06), the median price of residential properties was down 3.5% from a year earlier.&#8221; (Actually probably more like 5% when you include seller subsidies, see earlier Blog on MRIS data.)</p>
<p>Yes they can make one mistake, but the NAR president repeatedly says we are at or near the bottom.&#8221; My earlier Blog exposes a NAR advertisement that says now is the time to &#8220;Buy Or Sell&#8221;, while only listing reasons to buy. How can one time happen to be perfect for both sides? I&#8217;ll tell you, <b>when money is involved and it flows to the recommending party</b>, that is how. Also the data is manipulated (see MRIS data report Blog).</p>
<p><span style="color:red;">JUST ADDED</span><br />Here was the T-Shirt that I was giving my clients at their closing. Even when buying a $3M house. This proves that I warned them about a potential bubble:<br /><img src="http://franklyrealty.com/05tshirtcrop.jpg" /><br />The 2004 version was featured in a <a target="nnww" href="http://franklyrealty.com/wsj-bubble.pdf"><img src="http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/0c52d715.jpg" /> Article</a> (near end).<br /><span style="color:red;">- &#8211; - &#8211; -</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Written by Frank Borges LL0SA- </span>Broker/Owner <a href="http://franklyrealty.com/">FranklyRealty.com</a><br />703-827-4006</p>
<p></span></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fdont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fdont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/dont-trust-nar-and-realtors-that-sell.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLS Data Fudged By Realtors. Watch out!</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/mls-data-fudging-by-realtors-watch-out.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/mls-data-fudging-by-realtors-watch-out.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data manipulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/mls-data-fudged-by-realtors-watch-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are putting in an offer to buy a house, and you aren&#8217;t using a FranklyRealty.com agent (God knows why you wouldn&#8217;t but lets just say you are stuck with your agent), make sure you have your agent look out for MLS fudging.
There are 2 levels of MLS fudging. One is a NVAR (Local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are putting in an offer to buy a house, and you aren&#8217;t using a FranklyRealty.com agent (God knows why you wouldn&#8217;t but lets just say you are stuck with your agent), <b>make sure you have your agent look out for <span style="color:red;">MLS fudging</span>.<br /></b><br /><img src="http://franklyrealty.com/fudge.gif" /></p>
<p>There are 2 levels of MLS fudging. One is a <span style="font-weight:bold;">NVAR </span>(Local Realtor association) <span style="font-weight:bold;">violation</span> and the other is borderline ethical.<span>  And there are 2 reasons agents fudge the MLS.
<ul>
<li><b>BORDERLINE MLS FUDGING</b> (like sugar-free fudge, is it really fudge?):<br />This is what happens when a listing agent wants to<span style="font-weight:bold;"> re-list a property </span>they are already listing for sale. Maybe the house has sat for a few months or there is a big price change. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Instead of a 2 minute change</span>, they will withdraw one listing and <span style="font-weight:bold;">spend 30-45 minutes reentering all the data.<br /></span></li>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;"></span><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">This low-fat fudge will:</span>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">a) </span>Restart the Days On the Market &#8220;<span style="font-weight:bold;">M</span>&#8221; ticker, DOM<b>M</b> (The other ticker is DOM<b>P</b> which is ALL days for this <span style="font-weight:bold;">P</span>roperty regardless of normal relisting)</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">b) </span>Reset the &#8220;Original List Price&#8221;. </li>
</ul>
<p>So if a house drops from <span style="font-weight:bold;">$600k to $550k after 100 days,</span> and the plan is to drop again, but to $500k, the &#8220;borderline fudger&#8221; will do a normal delist (expire or withdraw) and relist.
<li>
<ul><span style="font-weight:bold;">a)</span> The new DOM<b>M</b> will be 1 (but the DOM<span style="font-weight:bold;">P</span> will be remain &#8220;101&#8243;)
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">b) </span>&#8220;Current List Price&#8221; will become $500k</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">c) </span>&#8220;Original List Price&#8221; will be $500k (the $600k is hidden and stays with the old listing)</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">80% of Realtors will see the DOM</span><span style="font-weight:bold;">P </span><span style="font-weight:bold;">at 101 and look back at the old listing to get more information before making an offer. <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">I found one agent did this <span style="font-size:130%;">17</span> times!</span></span></p>
</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">ILLEGAL MLS FUDGING </span>(very fattening fudge):</li>
<p>This fudge is harder to do. After delisting the property, the agent goes back to relist. The system by default will recognize the property by the address and ask you if you wish to pre-fill the Tax-ID and some other data from the tax records. And agent d<span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);font-weight:bold;">oing illegal fudging has to go out of their way to press NO and override the system by entering gibberish into a tax ID of 000000 </span>and then another <span style="font-weight:bold;">40 minutes reentering data</span>. <span style="font-style:italic;">(The MRIS claim that they have a system to protect against this, however I have seen it over a few dozen times.)</span>
<ul>
<li>This fattening fudge will:</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">a) </span>Restart BOTH the DOM<b>M</b> AND the DOM<span style="font-weight:bold;">P</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">b) </span>Reset the &#8220;Original List Price&#8221;.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">c) </span>Leave NO indication that this property ever was listed. </li>
<li><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);font-weight:bold;">It looks like a 100% brand new listing. This is a NVAR violation.</span></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">Maybe only 25% of Realtors will find this fudging. </span>They know that when submitting an offer they should <span style="font-weight:bold;">search for expires and withdrawn listings for that address</span> (and variations like St vs Street and N vs North).</p>
<p><b>What a shame that we can&#8217;t trust our fellow Realtors to be honest.</b></p>
<p><span style="font-style:italic;color:rgb(153,153,153);">In the graph above, that is </span><span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;color:rgb(153,153,153);">not the default of what a Realtor sees</span><span style="font-style:italic;color:rgb(153,153,153);"> after a search. I had to create a special search to put it in that form. It is much harder to find. Also note that in this case the first 4 light fudgings were from one agent and then a new agent took it on and did the Tax ID=0000 to reset everything. This is NOT as bad (still illegal) as one agent relisting multiple times using the 0000 trick.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);font-weight:bold;">NEW:</span><span style="font-weight:bold;"> Part 2:</span><a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/part-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-of-time.html"><br />Illegal MLS Fudging. 20% Chance You&#8217;ll See One</a>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">- Written by Frank Borges LL0SA- Broker/Owner</span> <a target="new" href="http://franklyrealty.com/">FranklyRealty.com</a><br />703-827-4OO6</p>
<p>Videos at <a target="new" href="http://youtube.franklyrealty.com/">YouTube.FranklyRealty.com</a><br /><i><span style="font-size:78%;color:silver;">Keywords: Housing bubble? Arlington, Alexandria, mls, homes, Real estate, Virginia, DC Realty, Realtor</span></i></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;"> </span></p>
<p></span></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fmls-data-fudging-by-realtors-watch-out.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fmls-data-fudging-by-realtors-watch-out.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/mls-data-fudging-by-realtors-watch-out.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 2: Illegal MLS Fudging. 20% Chance You&#039;ll See 1.</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/part-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-of-time.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/part-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-of-time.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data manipulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/part-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-chance-youll-see-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog is an extension on the blog &#8220;MLS Data Fudged By Realtors. Watch out!&#8221; This new post might not make sense without reading it first.
One blog reader asked me, &#8220;How frequently does MLS fudging really occurred. Are we talking once in a blue moon, is it commonplace or even the default?&#8221;Great question!
They wanted a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/Ra4ziB401QI/AAAAAAAAABs/-43HLduxHNg/s1600-h/fudge.gif"><img style="float:left;cursor:pointer;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_WXecsoUuRy0/Ra4ziB401QI/AAAAAAAAABs/-43HLduxHNg/s200/fudge.gif" border="0" /></a><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-style:italic;">This blog is an extension on the blog &#8220;</span><a href="http://franklyrealty.blogspot.com/2007/01/mls-data-fudging-by-realtors-watch-out.html" target="new">MLS Data Fudged By Realtors. Watch out!</a><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102);font-style:italic;">&#8221; This new post might not make sense without reading it first.</span></p>
<p><b>One blog reader asked me, &#8220;How frequently does <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">MLS fudging really occurred.</span> Are we talking once in a blue moon, is it commonplace or even the default?&#8221;</b><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br />Great question!</span><span></p>
<p>They wanted a breakdown of the frequency of both the <span style="font-weight:bold;">Fat-Free MLS Fudge </span>(technically allowed which is the same agent relisting a property to reset some data like the DOMM not DOMP and Starting Price), and the<span style="font-weight:bold;"> Full-o-Fat MLS Fudging </span>that is a MRIS violation, which resets the DOMM and DOMP and makes the listing look brand new, with no trace of the old listing.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Quick DOMM vs DOMP recap. </span>
<ul>
<li>DOMM= Days on the Market- MLS (days for that MLS listing only)</li>
<li>DOMP= Days on the Market for the property (regardless of relistings, unless fudged)</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Quick Full-o-Fudge MLS recap. </span></p>
<p>An agent can pull their listing and when given a 1 click option to restart it, bypass the default and put &#8220;00000&#8243; in the tax id box. <span style="font-weight:bold;">This is an MRIS violation</span> but done so that buyers and many agents won&#8217;t see how long it has been on the market, in hopes of getting a higher price.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">My estimations:</span><br />I can&#8217;t get exact figures. There are probably <span style="font-weight:bold;">over 10,000 active listings right now</span> in this area. The system only allows us to pull up 500 at a time. While I was able to search for Tax ID 00* (* meaning anything after two zeros), and 999*, XX* and 123* I then had to manually look up EACH result to make sure it wasn&#8217;t a new construction or condo conversion (which don&#8217;t have Tax ID&#8217;s yet and putting in &#8220;000&#8243; is and acceptable and legit practice). Some of you might think I have too much time on my hand <span style="font-style:italic;">(maybe since I sometimes talk people OUT of buying)</span>, but I don&#8217;t have THAT much time.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">So I pulled up one county and price range and did a sample analysis.</span> <span style="font-weight:bold;">2400 active homes analyzed. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">My search criteria:</span><br />Homes and condos in Fairfax County priced from $300,000 to $600,000 built before 2004.<br />The result was 2400. (Since the max search is 500 I had to do smaller $50k range searches and add them.)</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Then I searched for tax ID of 00*,XX*, 999* and came up with about 40 results. </span>Again, sometimes not having the Tax ID (which attaches a property to prior MLS listings) can be legit in cases of new construction, condo conversion and a couple other reasons.</p>
<p>So I took those 40 and opened another browser. I searched for that street address and included all <span style="font-weight:bold;">Withdrawns, Temp off, and Expired to see if that property was previously listed and whether the Tax ID of 000 was used to reset the data.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">I found 21 Full-o-Fat MLS Fudgings </span>and 17 of those were from the same agent (vs a new agent taking on a listing and wanting to reset everything, which is also not allowed but not AS bad in my opinion).</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">So out of the sample of 2400 homes, I found 21. Which is just under 1%. </span>This doesn&#8217;t seem like a lot and I do remember seeing it fairly frequently, so I started looking at that 1% another way.</p>
<p>Lets say an average buyer might go into about 7-10 homes, they probably have the agent look into about 20 homes online. <span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">That means there is a 20%</span> </span>(20, 1% chances) <span style="font-weight:bold;"><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">chance that you will come across a listing that has been fudged by the Realtor</span> to deceive the public in order to get their listing sold faster.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Fat-Free MLS Fudge frequency?</p>
<p></span>So then I wanted to see how frequently a listing undergoes Fat-Free MLS Fudging, the act of relisting the property but not removing the Tax ID. This practice is allowed. <span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">Heck, one agent did it 17 times.</span></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t look at all 2400 homes, so<span style="font-weight:bold;"> I focused on 90</span>. , the results from a price range search of $499,900 to $500,000 in Fairfax built before 2004.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">25 of the 90 were relisted and had a different DOMM vs DOMP</span> (defined above). This 25 is legit, and tells you that there is a <span style="font-weight:bold;">ton of turnover </span>of listings to a different agent. <span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">Sucks</span> to be those that lose the listing agents losing those deals.</p>
<ul><span style="font-weight:bold;">Of the 25 active listings with a DOMM and DOMP discrepancy</span>
<li>15 were new listings from one agent taking over for another agent. <span style="font-weight:bold;">This is 100% legit.</span></li>
<li>10 were the same agent (<span style="font-weight:bold;">Fat-Free Fudge</span>, allowed but questionable)</li>
<li>3 (of the 10) were <span style="font-weight:bold;">relisted and withdrawn 3 times</span> for a total of 4 MLS #s each</li>
<li>1 (of the 10) was Full-o-Fat Fudged</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Conclusion:</span><br /><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">About 12% of listings get relisted by the same agent</span><br /><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">About 3% of the time they relist it multiple times, sometimes 4 times.</span><br /><span style="color:rgb(255,0,0);">About 1% of the listings (in the example of 90 and 2400) are fudged.</span></p>
<p>So if you look at 20 properties, there is a almost certain chance that a few were using the Fat-Free Fudge technique and probably <span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">a 20% chance that you will encounter the illegal fudging technique.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Why does this matter?</span><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:rgb(255,0,0);">When bidding on a property, you should have ALL the available information. </span>If a place appears to have just hit the market 5 days ago, there might be a little rush to winsecure it. If you bought it to then find out that it was really on the market for 300 days, you wouldn&#8217;t be happy that you were duped. Also the amount you offer might be lower if it sat for the same price for 200 days.
<ul><span style="font-weight:bold;">Recommendations:<br /></span>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">MRIS </span>(our local MLS system), do a better job at catching these manipulations. A simple review of all 00* would be a start. Secondly <span style="font-weight:bold;">impose fines </span>and get serious about cracking down on this. (Email me if you want an address to complain to MRIS)</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Buyer Agent Realtors</span>, report these violations to compliance, they can reset the listings.</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Listing Agent Realtors</span>, stop fudging the MLS or risk losing your l<br />
icense!</li>
<li><span style="font-weight:bold;">Buyers</span>, don&#8217;t be scared, just be aware and make sure your agent double checks into this before putting in an offer. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Also ask your agent if </span>their emailed reports use the DOMM or the DOMP (most use the DOMM).</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color:rgb(153,153,153);font-style:italic;"><span style="font-weight:bold;">Disclaimer: </span>The data that I collected might not be statistically perfect, but it was the best that I could do. I would be happy to work with a research person to get more exact figures. Also the Fat-Free Fudge, which is allowed, is my opinion not kosher, many agents might debate this or say it is company policy. To each his own. I just wanted to bring up the debate.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">Now talk amongst yourselves&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">- Written by Frank Borges LL0SA- Broker/Owner </span><a href="http://franklyrealty.com/" target="new">FranklyRealty.com</a><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">703-827-4OO6</span><br /></span></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fpart-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-of-time.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2007%2F01%2Fpart-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-of-time.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/01/part-2-illegal-mls-fudging-20-of-time.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;America&#039;s Most Admired Professions=Real Estate Agents&quot;&#8230; NOT!</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2006/12/newsflash-americas-most-admired.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2006/12/newsflash-americas-most-admired.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shady Agent Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/americas-most-admired-professionsreal-estate-agents-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those that didn&#8217;t see Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan, that was a &#8220;NOT joke.&#8221;
Forbes came out with an article reviewing America&#8217;s Most Admired Professions and Real Estate Agents were&#8230; amongst the bottom 3 in the Harris poll.
Watch this:As a Real Estate Agent and Realtor, this is embarrassing. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that didn&#8217;t see <b>Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan</b>, that was a <i>&#8220;NOT joke.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Forbes came out with an article reviewing <a target="new" href="http://www.forbes.com/leadership/2006/07/28/leadership-careers-jobs-cx_tvr_0728admired.html">America&#8217;s Most Admired Professions</a> and Real Estate Agents were&#8230; amongst the bottom 3 in the Harris poll.</p>
<p>Watch this:<br /><p><a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2006/12/newsflash-americas-most-admired.html"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p><br />As a Real Estate Agent and Realtor, this is embarrassing.  <span>  As you will see throughout this blog, we will try to give you an insider perspective. Also we pledge to never talk you into buying. <b>But if you are ready to buy,</b> we&#8217;ll help and make sure you are protected (as much as possible) from a further downturn with an aggressive price drop. </p>
<p>This is where my fully disclosed shameless plug will end, welcome to FranklyRealty.com. <img align="middle" src="http://frankly.com/smallfranklyrealtylogo.gif"><br /><b><br />- Written by Frank Borges LL0SA</b>- Broker/Owner <a target="neww" href="http://www.franklyrealty.com">FranklyRealty.com</a><br />703-827-4006</p>
<p>Videos at <a target="new" href="http://youtube.Franklyrealty.com">YouTube.FranklyRealty.com</a></p>
<p><i><font size="1" color="silver">Keywords: Housing bubble? Arlington, Alexandria, MLS, Homes, Real estate, Virginia, Alexandria, 22201, 22314, Fairfax Va, DC <br /></font></i></span></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2006%2F12%2Fnewsflash-americas-most-admired.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2006%2F12%2Fnewsflash-americas-most-admired.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2006/12/newsflash-americas-most-admired.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

