<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FranklyRealty.com Trust Me I'm A REALTOR &#187; Tax Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/category/tax-data/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sellers Should Pay All Closing Costs</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2010/02/seller-closing-costs.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2010/02/seller-closing-costs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data manipulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.franklyrealty.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, this is kinda tricky to explain, so bear with me. 
I feel strongly that ultimately the seller should pay for all (actually &#8220;most&#8221;) closing costs. But not in the way that you might be thinking. And this type of post will lead to the 101 hyper technical &#8220;but what if&#8221; scenarios and counterarguments. 
I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/vv301/franklyrealty/2418695_3600b4cab5_m.jpg?t=1265937438" title="Cash" class="alignleft" width="240" height="134" />Ok, this is kinda tricky to explain, so bear with me. </p>
<p>I feel strongly that ultimately the seller should pay for all (actually &#8220;most&#8221;) closing costs. But not in the way that you might be thinking. And this type of post will lead to the 101 hyper technical &#8220;but what if&#8221; scenarios <span id="more-356"></span>and counterarguments. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not talking about &#8220;Negotiate strongly and beat down the seller by getting closing costs thrown in, heck this is a buyer&#8217;s market!&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m talking about &#8220;The seller should care about their NET.&#8221; Once the net is established, go back and ask if the price can be adjusted (INCREASED) to include closing costs.<br />
<strong><br />
Example: $500,000 with 0 closing costs vs $510,000 with $10,000 back.</strong></p>
<p>Why?<br />
The higher the recording closing price, the better for the buyer. Ie $510,000<br />
<b>1) In the short term for comps:</b> The higher it records on the county records and the MLS the better it is for &#8220;comps.&#8221; In other words it helps the next similar unit close for higher, which is better for the buyer (ie more of the cheesy &#8220;instant equity&#8221;).  </p>
<p>Note that the MLS DOES show the seller subsidy (closing costs paid by seller) in Virginia, DC, MD, but<br />
a) not everyone sees it (even though FranklyMLS nets out all closing costs when showing sold prices).<br />
b) not all appraisers will adjust 100% for it (thus helping the next unit appraise for higher).</p>
<p><b>2) Better loan.</b><br />
 For some people adding back in 2% in closing costs, can help people jump from a 15% down loan to a 20% down loan, thus dropping the rate significantly.</p>
<p><b>3) In the long term:</b> since the county records do NOT show the closing costs, this helps the buyer when they sell the unit in a few years. Many do-it-yourselfers and data hounds will say &#8220;well you bought it for $510,000&#8230; therefore&#8221; instead of &#8220;well you bought it for $500,000&#8230; therefore.&#8221; I would rather make it look like I spent more (and in essence, with all the closing costs, you really did spend $510k, so why not have people see that number?).</p>
<p><b>Common counter-arguments:</b></p>
<p>1)  Some will say this <b>artificially inflates the marketplace</b> and might lead to a subsequent crash. Answer: I&#8217;m talking about a benefit to the individual buyer. A buyer agent&#8217;s job is to do what is in the best interest of the client, while being legal. </p>
<p>2) <b>Taxes will go up.</b> Yes, perhaps. Maybe $50 a year, big deal.<br />
<b> Buyer tip:</b> See post on NOT using <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html">Tax Assessments to value a home</a>)<br />
<b>Seller tip:</b> Since some buyers DO use this, the HIGHER the tax assessment the better, so think twice <a href="http://activerain.com/blogsview/216044/Tax-Assessment-Don-t">before fighting to get it lowered, see post</a>)</p>
<p>3) Seller might have to pay the <b>commission on the seller subsidy</b>.<br />
Yes, this might be the case. The buyer can offer to pay the difference. Or skip the idea of asking for more seller subsidies after the fact, and ask for it up front in the initial offer. </p>
<p><b>Things to watch out for:</b><br />
1) Don&#8217;t make the<b> seller subsidy too high.</b> This isn&#8217;t free money. Sometimes a lender will say &#8220;sure we can use up 3% or 4%&#8221;, but that defeats the point. Don&#8217;t start buying points if you weren&#8217;t already planning to.</p>
<p>2) The contract reads &#8220;Up to X in seller closing costs.&#8221; If you put a number that is too high, then the rest goes back to the seller. You can maybe add in your contract &#8220;unused closing costs will result in a drop in the contract price, with the same net to the seller.&#8221; Or get from your lender the closing cost estimate and leave $2,000 in wiggle room. Also if you need to use up the funds, you can count your home inspection and sometimes up to a year in condo fees. Worst case scenario, you can do a 2-1 buy down (more complex, prepays part of your mortgage) to use up funds.</p>
<p>3) Watch out if you ask for a credit for home inspection items, you don&#8217;t want your credits to go so high that the lender won&#8217;t allow it.</p>
<p>4) This might get tricky with how the appraisal is handled (it can actually help), but I can go into that next time as that can take a long time to explain.</p>
<p>Sorry if this was a little complex, but it is something that I strongly believe in, and I think most of you will get it. Feel free to add more &#8220;well, what if&#8230;&#8221; I did it for my personal home, and I would do it to help my clients.</p>
<p>Make sure to sign up for future posts!</p>
<p>Written by <b>Frank Borges LL0SA</b><br />
Broker FranklyRealty.com<br />
Owner FranklyMLS.com </p>
<p>Cash photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/emdot">emdot</a></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fseller-closing-costs.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2010%2F02%2Fseller-closing-costs.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2010/02/seller-closing-costs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Use Tax Assessments to Value a Home!</title>
		<link>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html</link>
		<comments>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franktempblog.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-a-home/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FranklyMLS.com now offers in the spreadsheet view a % Difference between the Tax Assessment and the List Price. But I&#8217;m here to tell you that I see too many buyers giving TOO MUCH weight to the tax records and tax assessments. (So why offer it? Well cuz you want it anyway).
Problems with Tax Assessments on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://franklymls.com/"><img style="float:left;cursor:hand;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_496b686a.jpg" border="0" alt="" />FranklyMLS.com</a> now offers in the spreadsheet view a<strong> % Difference between the Tax Assessment and the List Price</strong>. But I&#8217;m here to tell you that I see too many buyers giving TOO MUCH weight to the tax records and tax assessments. (So why offer it? Well cuz you want it anyway).</p>
<div><strong>Problems with Tax Assessments on the MLS:</strong></div>
<p><strong>1) The MLS freezes tax data <span id="more-161"></span>on the day the home is listed.</strong></p>
<p>Example: Last week the MLS finally refreshed the data for all of <a href="http://franklymls.com/default.aspx?m=R&amp;h=400K&amp;s=prince+william">Prince William </a>County. Homes listed <strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">before June 25th 08 will still show the $50k-$150k HIGHER 07 data</span>.</strong> So you might try to compare 2 tax assessments find 1 being taxed at $600,000 and a much bigger house next door, showing up as taxed at $500,000. (If enough people ask, I can make FranklyMLS.com show the tax year in the spreadsheet mode)</p>
<div><strong>Problems with Tax Records &amp; Former Sales Data</strong></div>
<p><strong>1) They don&#8217;t show seller subsidy!</strong><br />
Sometimes the subsidy can be $30,000. So you think a home sold for $500k, but it really sold for $470,000 net. On the MLS the seller subsidy must be disclosed. (except when <a href="http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2007/02/beware-arlington-condos-new.html">seller subsidy is improperly hidden</a>)</p>
<p>(<em>Sidenote: I&#8217;m big on<span style="color:#ff0000;"> <strong>stacking seller subsidy</strong></span>, as much as the lender will allow. The seller cares about net, but it is my opinion that a higher recorded price will help your resale and the neighborhood, especially those that think Realtors are worthless and get their data only from the county. Also it can get you into a loan with a lower rate, just ask for details.)</em></p>
<p><strong>2) 30-90- days behind</strong>. Sometimes months behind the MLS Sold data (not available publicly).</p>
<p><strong>3) Bank Sales Price is inaccurate.</strong> If you see a home that was $500k in 05 and the bank &#8220;pays&#8221; $300k for it last week, don&#8217;t think that that was a real transaction and somehow their break even is really $300k. Otherwise you could have bought it for $301k (which is not the <a href="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_bf1f9b68.gif"><img style="float: right; width: 111px; cursor: hand; margin: 0 0 10px 10px;" src="http://s68.photobucket.com/albums/i18/franklyfrank1/th_bf1f9b68.gif" border="0" alt="" height="177" /></a>case).</p>
<p align="center"><strong></strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Problems specifically with Tax Assessment</strong></p>
<div><strong>1) Owners fight to lower their Assessment.</strong> <a href="http://activerain.com/blogsview/216044/Tax-Assessment-Don-t">DON&#8217;T FIGHT THEM</a>! (see post)</div>
<div>My mother used to always do this. Great she saved $25/mo, but now buyers sleuthing the tax records, incorrectly think her home is <strong>worth $40k less</strong>.</div>
<div><strong>2) Little rhyme or reason.</strong><br />
Nobody knows exactly how the computer in the sky picks the tax assessment for a unit. Rarely does it account for upgrades, view, facing Rt 66?, etc.<br />
For example 2 units in <a href="http://franklymls.com/default.aspx?m=R&amp;h=ALL&amp;s=clarendon+1021">Clarendon 1021</a>. One is a 600 sqft studio, one is a 600 sqft 1bdr. Both bought for the same price. That extra wall somehow makes the tax assessment 10% higher.</div>
<div><strong>Benefits of Looking at Tax Records</strong></div>
<p><strong><br />
1) <span style="color:#ff0000;">Free Sneak Peak on Bank Listings Coming Soon.</span></strong><br />
Look for a &#8220;nearby sales&#8221; link and discover bank owned homes that have not hit the MLS yet (most eventually do). These can take 1-2 months, but knowing about these can be very helpful in negotiations or in deciding what/when to buy. (ex: <a href="http://www.arlingtonva.us/Departments/RealEstate/reassessments/scripts/saleslist.asp?Action=View&amp;nbhd=230001&amp;lrsn=61203&amp;backRPC=18025416">Arlington Tax o</a><a href="http://www.arlingtonva.us/Departments/RealEstate/reassessments/scripts/saleslist.asp?Action=View&amp;nbhd=230001&amp;lrsn=61203&amp;backRPC=18025416">n building 1021</a>)<br />
<em>(Sidenote, was that tip helpful? That is just the beginning. Subscribe or email me.)</em></p>
<p><strong></strong><strong>2) Verify MLS Data.</strong> Is it really a 4 bedroom? Is the agent trying to sneak in another non-legit bedroom? The tax records are a good place to verify this data and square footage data.</p>
<p>Too frequently I will get an Excel spreadsheet from a well intentioned buyer, based on the Tax records. Who needs a stinking Realtor anyhow right? Sorry, but it tends to be all wrong.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t know what you don&#8217;t know. (upcoming post)</p>
<p>Sure, I&#8217;ll take a peek at Virginia Tax Assessments &amp; Records, and see if they reveal anything interesting, but I won&#8217;t rely on them too heavily.</p>
<p><strong>Written by Frank Borges LL0SA- Broker FranklyRealty.com</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>(please report typos)</p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fdont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.franklyrealty.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fdont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.franklyrealty.com/2008/07/dont-use-tax-assessments-to-value-home.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
